| |
Politics Triumph Over Science in Europe, says Industry
WASHINGTON, Nov 10/PRNewswire/ -- American Chemistry
Council Phthalate
Esters Panel issued the following:
The Phthalate Esters Panel (Panel) is dismayed and disappointed
that the European Commission has approved a short-term emergency ban on phthalates
in children's toys based on political pressure and certain allegations from
Greenpeace and other activist organizations. The Commission's failure to base
its judgments on the weight of scientific evidence jeopardizes the consumer
protection process.
The Panel strongly believes, based on extensive scientific research,
that phthalates pose no hazard to children when they are used properly in soft
vinyl toys. Moreover, the Panel is not alone in its belief -- several independent
reviews, including reviews by preeminent scientists and government agencies,
support this view. The reviews include the following:
- In 1998, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) conducted
a comprehensive evaluation of potential exposure to diisononyl phthalate
(DINP), the principal phthalate used in children's products. In its report,
the CPSC stated, "The data show that none of the daily intake estimates
exceed the . . . acceptable daily intake (ADI)."1
CPSC also stated, "Generally, the amount ingested does not even come
close to a harmful level."2
- A 1998 Dutch Consensus Group evaluation found that exposures to DINP from
toys would be below a conservatively derived ADI - in most cases, well below.
The report stated the possibility of a child's exposure exceeding the ADI
is "so rare that the statistical likelihood cannot be estimated on
the basis of the current data."3
- In June 1999, a blue-ribbon panel of independent scientists chaired by
former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. C. Everett Koop concluded in a written report
that the phthalate ester used in toys is safe for that use.4
This inappropriate action follows an equally flawed decision in
France to ban phthalates in children's toys. That action has been legally challenged
by the French Association of Organic Chemical Industry, the French Association
of Plastics Producers and several companies based upon a "clear abuse of
discretion from the French authorities."
The Panel recognizes that allegations from Greenpeace and other
activist organizations, which have regrettably received widespread media coverage,
may have unduly frightened parents of young children. The statements by the
U.S. CPSC, the Dutch Consensus Group, and the Blue-Ribbon Panel of Experts chaired
by Dr. Koop should put their minds at ease.
Since its inception 25 years ago, the Panel and its members have
sponsored health and safety research for phthalate esters including research
and testing on issues related to children's health protection. The Panel is
committed to working cooperatively with agencies responsible for children's
health, so that phthalate esters may continue to be used safely in toys and
other vinyl products.
For more information on this subject, call Marian Stanley, Phthalate
Esters Panel manager, at 703-741-5623, or visit our website at
www.phthalates.org.
ENDNOTES
- CPSC (1998). The Risk of Chronic Toxicity Associated
with Exposure to Diisononyl Phthalate (DINP) in Children's Products, Executive
Summary.
- CPSC, CPSC Releases Study on Phthalates in Teethers,
Rattles and Other Children's Products, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission Press Release # 99-031 (Dec. 2, 1998).
- RIVM (Rijksinstituut voor Volsgezondheid en Milieu),
Phthalate Release from Soft PVC Baby Toys: Report from the Dutch Consensus
Group, RIVM report 613320 002, W.H. Konemann, ed. (September 1998).
- American Council on Science and Health (1999). A Blue
Ribbon Panel Report: A Scientific Evaluation of Health Effects of Two Plasticizers
Used in Medical Devices and Toys. Dr. C. Everett Koop, Chairman.
|